Quote:
Originally Posted by Incognitas
Eh?How can you say that? 
---------- Post added at 19:18 ---------- Previous post was at 19:09 ----------
I've just read this entire thread and I'm astounded.
I bet the anti grassers would be the FIRST to complain if it was them who was the victim of theft.
I also bet they are the ones who habitually claim that the police do nothing about crime.Well yes of course they don't IF NO ONE TELLS THEM A CRIME HAS BEEN COMMITTED and that would be grassing wouldn't it? 
That attitude is frankly moronic. |
You have just read the entire thread and you still can't understand? OK then, I'll put it simple for you:
1. Someone reports a crime.
2. In order for the body responsible to actually do something about it, they have to provide some evidence.
3. When it is their word against someone else's word, they have to stand behind it and stay there, not hide behind anonymity.
4. If there is no evidence, and no witness statement, the report will just go in the bin, or in the bottom of a dusty drawer.
5. Finally, if the person reporting wants to actually stop the crime, they cannot stay anonymous.