Thread: VM CEO: We don't need HD channels
View Single Post
Old 26-04-2008, 21:15   #63
frogstamper
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Brighton
Age: 61
Services: VIP
Posts: 3,705
frogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronze
frogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronze
Re: VM CEO: We don't need HD channels
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick Fisher View Post
Maybe? Maybe not?

Since VM have always claimed they make nothing from their TV Service it becomes clear why they do not invest in it.

Landlines seem to becoming a dead dog too.

It's not surprising that VM have stated that they only want to concentrate on their BroadBand Service.

If only they would do as they state because it seems the BroadBand Service is in danger of descending to the standard set by their dreadful TV service.

Well said Mick, if BB is indeed now VMs flagship product, Berkett for unknown reasons seems to be steering it towards the rocks. I cant believe Mr Branson is satisfied with the "publicity" this company is bringing to the Virgin brand.
frogstamper is offline   Reply With Quote