Quote:
Originally Posted by Tharrick
Hmm, maybe somebody should contact them and point that out :P
|
As a Yorkshire-man I have contacted the South Yorks based company and alerted them to the issue. I don't see why they should risk being tar'd with the same brush!
Dunno if there's anything they can do, but they might want to add a note to their website...
Hank
---------- Post added at 12:43 ---------- Previous post was at 12:32 ----------
Well, I contacted my MP again following the release of the excellent legal analysis document. I enquired if she would consider signing Early Day Motion (EDM) 1311.
Now what I was not aware of, was that EDMs are used by backbench MPs to put pressure on the Government, and I was also ignorant of my Labour MP's role in this governemnt as a Parliamentary Private Secretary to one of the Cabinet.
So she is considered a member of the Government and as such it would be inappropriate for her to sign the EDM.
That said, she does put this in writing:
"I fully support the sentiment of EDM 1311 and share your concerns over the Phorm [Webwise] system."
She is awaiting a reply from DfBERR (since 10th April), in common with several people then (including the Earl of Northesk - they are very late replying now aren't they?)
More to follow then...
Hank
---------- Post added at 12:49 ---------- Previous post was at 12:43 ----------
As a BT customer for my internet connection, should I not be able to request my local Police force carry out an investigation into whether or not I was the subject of a crime by BT in 2006 or 2007?
I don't have any evidence, save for the fact that BT said they did do it, so although I do not have any evidence myself, surely the fact that they admit they did it is enough to suggest the police should interview someone from BT about it?
Comments anyone?
Hank