View Single Post
Old 25-04-2008, 23:16   #4868
Rchivist
Inactive
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 831
Rchivist has a fine set of QuadsRchivist has a fine set of QuadsRchivist has a fine set of QuadsRchivist has a fine set of QuadsRchivist has a fine set of QuadsRchivist has a fine set of QuadsRchivist has a fine set of QuadsRchivist has a fine set of QuadsRchivist has a fine set of QuadsRchivist has a fine set of QuadsRchivist has a fine set of QuadsRchivist has a fine set of QuadsRchivist has a fine set of QuadsRchivist has a fine set of Quads
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]

Quote:
Originally Posted by ceedee View Post
I wonder if it might rattle BT's corporate cage if you asked them to publicly indemnify all consenting BT Webwise users should any legal proceedings be started against them? (Although if I remember correctly, you cannot enforce an indemnity against an illegal action?)

If nothing else, it might get somebody to evaluate the potential legal liability should all BT's privacy and legal research be overturned...
The next question to follow up BT's answer on this one is along the lines of:..
"I showed your answer to website TOUGHGUYdotCOM and they said they specifically forbid me to visit their site and they also specifically forbid you to use their domain name in their cookie,and they said there was a notice to that effect on their site, and that if they saw me anywhere near their site with my Webwise rubbish, they'd sue the kilobytes off both me and my *!X$*|**! ISP - is it still safe to visit that site while signed up to Webwise?"

They amaze me - they seem to think that if they say it's legal then everything is okay no matter what any other party thinks.
Rchivist is offline