Thread: VM CEO: We don't need HD channels
View Single Post
Old 24-04-2008, 18:51   #14
brundles
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 1,266
brundles is a pillar of societybrundles is a pillar of societybrundles is a pillar of societybrundles is a pillar of societybrundles is a pillar of societybrundles is a pillar of societybrundles is a pillar of societybrundles is a pillar of societybrundles is a pillar of societybrundles is a pillar of societybrundles is a pillar of societybrundles is a pillar of societybrundles is a pillar of societybrundles is a pillar of societybrundles is a pillar of societybrundles is a pillar of societybrundles is a pillar of societybrundles is a pillar of societybrundles is a pillar of societybrundles is a pillar of society
Re: VM CEO: We don't need HD channels
Quote:
Originally Posted by foreverwar View Post
I am not trying to be controversial, but I couldn't find where, in the article, either of them said "We only need one HD channel" - in fact, the article states "The cable operator is currently running a major marketing campaign focusing on VoD and claims to be expanding content rapidly, including in HD"
That's a fair comment, but what the article IS saying is that they don't feel they need more HD channels. As they only have 1 now, that's essentially the same as saying they only need 1 HD channel.

Another article here. At the risk of asking a stupid question, can someone clarify what they're referring to by "sweetheart deals"?
brundles is offline   Reply With Quote