Quote:
Originally Posted by CWH
Firstly apologies if this comes across slightly incoherent, but I'm trying to get my ducks in a row.
Assuming BT has a legitimate technical reason to carry out these multiple trials, why haven't the other two ISP's also been doing trials? Does it possibly indicate that there might be an unknown agreement, (to us,) that BT is doing all the technical trials on behalf of all three ISP's.
If that is so, and it feels as though it could well be - to me at least; does that imply that if a legal challenge against the BT trials were successful, then the other two ISP's could well be implicated. At least, they could be seen to have encouraged an illegal act.
Colin
|
In which case, BT would (hypothetically) have to grass the others up, and try and negotiate a deal, or else they might (allegedly) be left with Phorm in the dock, BT for (allegedly) "doing" the crime and Phorm for (allegedly) inciting it. It'll be a while before anyone's in court.