Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexanderHanff
So basically the Home Office have just stated:
"Our public statement was not based on any technical analysis or any legal analysis and is in fact not even worth the paper it is printed on. Phorm's shares are worth more than our statement, please ignore it."
Of course the irony here is that they state only the courts can make a legal judgement, yet they refuse to investigate the issue either themselves or through the police they control, in order to get the courts to make a judgement in the first place.
Alexander Hanff
|
I have this 70 year old picture of a BT executive in front of a microphone at Heston Aerodrome, saying
"...the settlement of the Phorm/Webwise problem, which has now been achieved is, in my view, only the prelude to a larger settlement in which all of the internet may find Phorm. This morning I didn't have another talk with Home Office, but here is the paper which bears Simon Watkin's name upon it although not mine, (waves paper to the PhormPRTeam - receiving loud cheers and "Hear Hears" ). Some of you, perhaps, have already heard what it contains but I would just like to read it to you ...".
Later, from the dock of the court, the same executive, holding the same note, says, "My good friends, for the second time in our history, a British Telecom executive has returned from Ertugrul bringing Phorm with honour. I believe it is Phorm for our time."
Apologies to Wikipedia. Permission for reproduction granted.