Quote:
Originally Posted by mark777
Regarding the 80/20 video, my feeling is that there is no valid reason for delay.
Nobody is asking for broadcast quality. It's supposed to be a complete record, so there is no need for 'editorial' arguments or seeking permission to publish it. A pro company was employed to produce it so there should be no competance issues.
Somebody is delaying it.
|
As I explained after I returned from the event last week, they used 2 cameras to shoot the event with a single, separate audio recording. Their reason for this was to avoid audio sync issues between the cameras. They explained to me after the event (at the gathering) that they would produce a complete video of the entire event based on the audio but in order to produce the best video possible they would be cutting the film from both cameras in order to splice together a complete video from the parts.
This is almost 3 hours of footage per camera (so almost 6 hours combined) so the post production work on the film is already a significant task. Also Lecture Theatres are designed to amplify and carry voices so I expect there is a great deal of cleaning required on the audio to erase background noise which would effect the quality of the recording.
I am trying to be objective on this and as such I believe it is important to consider the above points.
Alexander Hanff