[fidbod]

Originally Posted by popper

wouldnt it be just a nice slice of cake with cream topping to issue a named person injunction on these same directors and managers ,as iv been saying for a while now ,alexander, did those books by any chance clarify those howto points, and about potentially using the SC to do it?.

http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2008/...vice-on-phorm/
"
FIPR calls on Home Office to withdraw misleading advice on Phorm

Phorm storm[/URL] "[/LIST]

OMFG - that paper has made my day.

Can I draw everyones attention to paragraph 43. to parapharase, having established Phorm's cookie system is false representation it only remains for a jury to decide if it is dishonest. I think that is going to be an easy case for any prosecutor to make. Just read the jury all the security advisorys on 121media.

On a more serious note. I shall be sending this hardcopy to my mp to read. keep the pressure up etc.

The paper also states that directors and managers are criminally liable if RIPA is breached by them in deploying Phorm. Make sure you remind every senior customer service representative you speak to, get them nervous as well.