Quote:
Originally Posted by popper
just because they call something 'industry practice' does not make it law... or legal.
|
Indeed.
I've had a call back from Virgin Media about the BBC article which says that VM "will automatically enrol anyone that does not explicitly ask to be excluded."
I have been advised that this report is wrong. Customers will not be forced to use Phorm if it is implemented. It is still not a foregone certainty that Phorm will be implemented.
So, if you're a VM customer then get writing to
Neil Berkett
CEO, Virgin Media
PO Box 333
Matrix Court
Swansea
SA7 9ZJ
Don't bother with e-mails to customer services. This is the address I've been given to write to in future. After recent outbursts, please keep it professional and civil.
I have already contacted BBC Newswatch about this (not that I expect a response) and this report has now been bought to the attention of higher ups at VM. I took the liberty of pointing VM to the
public meeting videos too.
---------- Post added at 18:36 ---------- Previous post was at 18:22 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deko
Not sure if anyone Caught this ?
from advfn
|
OK, so we have three possibilities.
One is that the comment does come from Lynne Millar but now word has gotten out Phorm are denying all knowledge.
Two is that the comment comes from one of Phorm's PR droids. Phorm's PR do have phorm in that area already, after all. Phorm are still denying all knowledge.
Either way there's an argument for possible market abuse here that needs to be investigated. "Ignorance is no excuse" as my law lecturer often said. Yes folks, I did a law unit at college too.
Three is that it's a complete fake. I'm sure the message board concerned logs the IP addresses of everyone who posts so it can be traced and identified. I would certainly hope that to be the case.
In which case what are Phorm's PR drones and supporters doing if they can't spot a fake posting from the company they work for or follow?