Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Delaney
Isn't part of BT's stratergy to introduce a clause into the T&C's in order to satisfy legal issues?
I would have thought that was illegal and you say that it is.
The problem lies in the fact that on several sensitive issues (RIPA) they seem to have proceeded on the advice of the people who uphold the law and what we thought was strictly forbidden turns out to be perfectly OK as long as the criterion in some clause - paragraph three, subsection two is applicable and it's transpired that pivoting on an interpretation of the law, BT just happen to meet it!
I would like to see how they will word any addition to their T&Cs - One thing you can guarantee is that a £1000.00 pound a day barrister will be writing it!
|
its not illegal, but it is unenforceable as in a waste of ink if you take the time to pull them about it through the already mentioned ways....
its not the people that uphold the law but rather the people that practice the law, remember, in court one side always losses....
it doesnt matter if its a barrister on £1000 an hour, if theres law to make it against your stat rights (and there is see prior post), thats the way it is.
because
you dont pull them about it,
that is the reason they get away with it.
just because they call something 'industry practice' does not make it law... or legal.
---------- Post added at 18:17 ---------- Previous post was at 18:07 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deko
Not sure if anyone Caught this ?
from advfn
|
url ?