Quote:
Originally Posted by Kursk
And, as I've said before, the PIA is bought and irrelevant; it won't include a list or the opinions of millions of people who feel their privacy is invaded so it can't be comprehensive.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ceedee
Just because you keep repeating something doesn't make any more relevant, accurate or truthful.
What leads you to believe that a PIA being paid for by it's subject makes it irrelevant?
Who else do you think is going to pay for Phorm's PIA?
Why do you believe that it's necessary for the PIA to contain "the opinions of millions" to be comprehensive, and by extension legitimate?
Perhaps you'd be good enough to quote relevant sections from the ICO's handbook within your answers?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kursk
I didn't say it did. I was mimicking CaptJamieHunter's turn of phrase hence the italics. Duh.
I am stating my opinions; I don't ask that you accept them. Others might.
|
|
|
That I find your continued
ad-hominem attacks offensive and unhelpful is irrelevant.
I requested that you substantiate and reference your expressed opinions in order that other readers could adequately evaluate them.
You are completely free to ignore those requests but I will attempt to highlight that, and I'm sure others will draw their own conclusions.
@Russ - Should you find any of my posts to be in any manner uncivil, please contact me by PM to explain how they detract from the accepted 'rules' of debate and I'll do my best to comply.