Quote:
Originally Posted by ceedee
Just because you keep repeating something doesn't make any more relevant, accurate or truthful.
What leads you to believe that a PIA being paid for by it's subject makes it irrelevant?
Who else do you think is going to pay for Phorm's PIA?
Why do you believe that it's necessary for the PIA to contain "the opinions of millions" to be comprehensive, and by extension legitimate?
Perhaps you'd be good enough to quote relevant sections from the ICO's handbook within your answers? |
I didn't say it did. I was mimicking CaptJamieHunter's turn of phrase hence the italics. Duh.
I am stating my opinions; I don't ask that you accept them. Others might.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexanderHanff
Exactly, someone has to do the PIA and to be honest I would rather that task landed at the feet of one of the worlds most reputable privacy advocates than some unknown startup which exists purely to cash in on the ICO recommendations.
Alexander Hanff
|
Sez who?