Quote:
Originally Posted by Kursk
And, as I've said before, the PIA is bought and irrelevant; it won't include a list or the opinions of millions of people who feel their privacy is invaded so it can't be comprehensive.
|
Just because you keep repeating something doesn't make any more relevant, accurate or truthful.
What leads you to believe that a PIA being paid for by it's subject makes it irrelevant?
Who else do you think is going to pay for Phorm's PIA?
Why do you believe that it's necessary for the PIA to contain "the opinions of millions" to be comprehensive, and by extension legitimate?
Perhaps you'd be good enough to quote relevant sections from the
ICO's handbook within your answers?