Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptJamieHunter
In the same way that my advice was often ignored by the decision makers of the groups I had been co-opted to. My presence on a particular advisory group did not mean that I agreed with the final decisions, as I invariably did not. Advice can be followed or ignored, it is not a mandatory instruction.
As I've said before, judge the PIA when it is published and not before. If it is as comprehensive a document as it should be then the names of all who contributed to it should be included.
Seconded. So keep on pressuring MPs, challenging Phorm when its staff or PR posts distorted facts, pointing people to the videos from the public meeting and doing whatever you can to keep this campaign alive.
|
Fine. Seems a waste of time meeting with him and writing to him then.
And,
as I've said before, the PIA is bought and irrelevant; it won't include a list or the opinions of millions of people who feel their privacy is invaded so it can't be comprehensive.
Btw, you did
know he was on the 80/20 advisory group didn't you?
