Thread: Question about capping.
View Single Post
Old 18-04-2008, 22:55   #11
frogstamper
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Brighton
Age: 61
Services: VIP
Posts: 3,705
frogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronze
frogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronze
Re: Question about capping.
Quote:
Originally Posted by zerovox View Post
I think you are right, but we have Sky TV at the moment.

It was the choice of changing our TV to VM or changing our BB and Phone to Sky.
I think Sky looks more promising at the moment, I don't like Neil BUrketts stance on Net Nutrality or capping. And the fact they own the cable monopoly means they can charge what they want.
Well zerovox Ive always defended VMs BB as on the whole a better product than adsl, but what with the prospect of at least 11 hours of stm a day even I cant defend the indefensible. Personally I always thought the best set up was Sky for the TV, VM for BB and BT for phone in an ideal world, but not anymore, VM are committing financial suicide in my opinion. I believe you will be the first of many VM customers leaving the sinking ship.
frogstamper is offline   Reply With Quote