I have just started to watch Kent's speech and I just burst out laughing. He quoted Dr Richard Clayton's statement as
proof that they (Phorm) 'can't know who you are' saying it was in his (Richard's) words but Richard was saying what Phorm have said and is their arguement. Richard merely says they have some justification for arguing that point he
doesn't say he agrees with it.
Before I watch any more I'm making sure I'm sitting well else I might hurt myself when I fall on the floor laughing.