[popper]

Originally Posted by roadrunner69

Did the ICO not read their own guidence document before their original statement on phorm?

This document is absolutely unequivocal on the rights of the users in the BT trials.

It seems that BT/phorm didn't make the slightest effort to comply with privacy regulations in these
trials and it does seem very suspicious regarding the lack of will to take this further by the police, home office and other bodies.

apparently not.

---------- Post added at 10:20 ---------- Previous post was at 10:12 ----------

have the following blocked:

88.208.248.102 - 88.208.250.85
phorm.com

Hmm, I can't even get to my modem configuration page (192.168.100.1) with those blocks.

Not just http, but ftp as well.

Originally Posted by Heed

I'm still seeing this behaviour today.

I've narrowed it down to the blocking of phorm.com.

Is no one else seeing this?

Does no one else have phorm.com blocked?

Seriously, no internet connectivity unless phorm.com is not blocked -- what else can that mean but all my internet activity is passing through, or relying upon a response from, phorm.com at some point?

that doesnt make sense... i cant think of any reason why blocking web routed IPs would effect local LAN IP routing