Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank
Post when you get resonses, I'll do the same and we can compare...
Hank
|
Hank, you may have already seen that the Earl of Northesk was kind enough to reply to me even though he is out of the country. Tomorrow, time and work allowing, I'll be replying to him. Anything I do get in reply from him will (with his permission, of course) be posted here.
Again, realism, not triumphalism.
---------- Post added at 23:59 ---------- Previous post was at 23:56 ----------
Who's being triumphalist? I'm just having a good mickey take after spending ages working on the
public meeting videos. I've already said what I'd like to see and that's what people need to work towards. However, much of that is dependent on other people (BT customers affected by the trials for example) taking actions that I cannot.
We need to continue to pressure the legislators to investigate Phorm and BT and to keep highlighting to as many people as we can the lack of government action and why Phorm is wrong.
The videos have been posted because a wider audience needs to be reached. That's not triumphalism, that's realism.
Now, is it just a coincidence that the ICO has started responding to complaints about Phorm? The complaint mentioned
here was four days before mine. Both answered at the same sort of time.
Pressure from above or a decision to whitewash all the Phorm complaints in one foul swoop?