Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptJamieHunter
They're all over 10 minutes long which I understand is the limit on YouTube. To avoid even the remotest chance of accusations of editing in any way I don't want them split. Apologies if this sounds dodgy but I want the videos seen full, unedited and raw.
I've e-mailed Chris Williams at The Register. LiveLeak seem happy to carry footage of Saddam's hanging but not this. Seems a bit odd, that.
|
well...... theres always the chance you might get VM to host them on the internal FTP servers ROTFL.
now that would be fun if you can find the tw/VM admins that look after the VM/tw freeware linux server space and get permission to host them there..... anyone know who that is, any CF VM employee member reading that can arrange that!
CJ, im reading the faq and it says in part this
http://www.liveleak.com/faq
"
Rejected media:
LiveLeak.com reserves the right to reject media for public viewing at the staff members' discretion.
We have set high standards with our staff when it comes to impartiality.
If you think you have had media unfairly rejected, we ask that you use the contact form and we will investigate your claim.
Rejected media is not deleted.
You can still share the links and have it viewable to the outside world.
It merely means that your media was not deemed suitable for the public areas of the site.
There are several reasons for this, your post could be a recent repost or material which cannot (or should not) be shown publicly.
We reserve the right to reject non-newsworthy graphic media or any media glorifying violence or death. "
so is it viewable now?