it seems darren's not updating much, is it because of no notewerthy quotes?, not likely, also i wonder if he will blog any Q&A....that must be happening right now.
Mick the main one i'd go for is as outlined in my reply to Florences HO email , #
3429 (BTW this is easy, left click and drag highlight the No., right click and copy, then paste into your reply)
I.e Simon Watkin at HO got duped (better for the story and keeping on side for later feedback that way) into a general RIPA what-if chat, and Phorm apparently turned it into a massive PR spin favouring a legal rather than illegal PHorm , totally mis-representing the good name of Simon.... :spin works both ways and it seems perfectly true.
and that contrary to the Phorm line, it seems clear now that those 2006 trials were, as outlined by Simon in general terms, infact unlawful and a undenyable collecting and processing is clearly visable even to the untrained eye.
need to search for those Phormed web messes in the boards again and include them in any CF stories and use a big stick to point this trail out ,clear as day, the DPI kit breaks HO Simon Watkin's most basic outlined chat..