Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick
Just keeping up with Darrens blog on the bbc site...
Is there anything this morning - afternoon that I have missed that I can quickly be fed uptodate on? I've have to trail back 80 or so posts and my eyes are tired ...  |
I think that the main development from today has been that some people are starting to get replies from the home office as highlighted by Florence's post above. The home office are not giving a legal backing as it is beyond their remit but they do seem to be stuck on the issue of personally identifiable information as opposed to the legal issues of interception. They also make the ludicrous suggestion that RIPA exists as a tool to cover government and police bodies with regard to interception on a security level when this clearly is not the case as I read the parts relating to interception of telecommunications.
PhormUKPR returned after a layoff to spout the same, tired spin
http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/34...-post3441.html
I highlighted that phorm are working hard to convince the FTC that they have a viable and legal model and it's worrying that the FTC may agree that they will see behaviour target advertising as an acceptable model for business.
http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/080414/20080414006002.html?.v=1