Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonglet
My bad then ignore everything i said about him im sure i read that he was commisoned for the project somewhere  sincere apologies to Mr Clayton ill edit accordingly.
Phorm still had a spin on this with a bit editing and is still not a 100% overview as was edited and didnt examine any source code. |
As you've climbed down on impugning Richard's independence, could I trouble you to examine your next (and probably libelous) claim against Simon and 80/20:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonglet
80/20 have been commisioned to produce a workable report with a glowing reference by phorm
|
Simon has a fearsome track record in defending public privacy rights; has explained and specified how the 80/20 PIA is independent of Phorm; and his interim report was hardly a "glowing reference".
Your on-going campaign of unsubstantiated innuendo and hysterical attacks on Simon's character does not further the discussion and denigrates the efforts of Alex and the rest of the forum's investigations of Phorm.
I'd invite you in future to provide sources for any claims against individuals who are demonstrably independent and, as far as I'm currently aware, beyond reproach.
In that post you also ask:
Quote:
|
Where is the expert independent non-paid for by phorm in this meeting seems to be none present.
|
If you'd like to put up some cash then I'm sure your independent expert would be welcome to attend. But then he'd be *your* expert and therefore not independent, wouldn't he?
---------- Post added at 17:26 ---------- Previous post was at 17:24 ----------
@Phorm PR
Still not managed to find the time to moderate my posts to the Phorm blog or respond to my question, I see?
So much for making it your priority...
