Hmmmm. Just noticed on the 80/20 thinking events page that the running order has changed yet again and now Alexander will be speaking 4th instead of 2nd. In some ways the new running order makes more sense but still makes me a little concerned. Hopefully Alexander has had some input on that issue.
---------- Post added at 16:26 ---------- Previous post was at 16:23 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonglet
Dr Richard Claytons report was commisoned by phorm this means phorm paid him to analyse and scrutinise the project....
{ snip }
|
Bonglet, not that I want to get into an argument but care to back up the accusation that he was paid by Phorm? I have seen no evidence of that. If you have some please show it. My understanding, and everything that I have read, points to the fact that both Dr Richard Clayton and Nicholas Boehm of the FIPR were
INVITED to discuss the Phorm system so they could give people a detailed technical analysis. Nowhere have I seen anything saying they were paid or commissioned. If you have anything to back that up then put it on the table so we can see it please.