[Bonglet]

Dr Richard Claytons report was edited by phorm this means phorm let him in to analyse and scrutinise the project, then PHORM editied it sent him back a copy then said that ok , he looks change couple of things says that sounds better ok to you too they said yes and he published it.
Who knows what is ommited i dont do you? has anyone put the question to mr clayton as what got ommited he is on record as saying his report wasnt 100% but he was happy with it (i take it phorm were too) so published it, they will have let some details go out into mainstream as any company trickles information out.
Is dr richard clayton an expert software programmer? did he view the full source code of such software that will be implemented in the final revison software of the spy product
all tick the no box.
Do you not agree that projects where data interception arise that there has to be full undisclosed information with fully independant relevant companies experts putting every aspect of such derivces through every test before it is deployed on a public?.

What is to stop phorm updating the software,hardware,firmware on such devices which impacts the network or could have implications on privacy issues in the future, they with the help of isp's involved could change such software or hardware to make a more dynamic profilled association to the user by MINING MORE data hence update 2.3 of the Phorm Data Collection could be fine but then implementing 2.4 without anyone's knowledge a month or 2 after everyone forgot could collect more data about yourself or your habits.

Do you see the point yet?