Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonglet
Greetings PhormUKPRteam how was the meeting with simon this morning good i hope, hope you guys were discussing how many overjoyed pr employee's will be spouting questions at tonights meeting (can anyone get a list of the 54 people turning up to tonights event) would be interesting to see how many are working or can be identified as working for phorm pr.
Any new information you can give us here about any new developments with this amazing peice of kit being developed? or you just here to sit around and spy on questions that might come and and go away and prepare answers if they ever arrived.
Can i also ask who is the real independent person apart from alexander who will be speaking?
Dr Richard Claytons report was commisoned edited and approved by phorm with a couple of leaks of info not everything people need to know.
80/20 have been commisioned to produce a workable report with a glowing reference by phorm and are in strategic patnership with Burson-Marsteller pr firm employed by phorm.
Where is the expert independent non-paid for by phorm in this meeting seems to be none present.
|
Bonglet before you go attacking Dr Richard Clayton remember he was invited by phorm not commissioned as far as I am aware and he has gone on the record stating that he believes the Phorm system contravenes RIPA as has Nicholas Boehm of the FIPR.
I am open to being proved wrong but those are the facts as far as I am aware.
---------- Post added at 16:09 ---------- Previous post was at 16:00 ----------
Just to add to what I said above:
"Overall, I learnt nothing about the Phorm system that caused me to change my view that the system performs illegal interception as defined by s1 of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000."
That is taken from paragraph 7 here:
http://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2...ebwise-system/