Quote:
Originally Posted by 80/20Thinking
---------- Post added at 01:13 ---------- Previous post was at 00:56 ----------
This is probably the most important point I will ever make on the issue of "consultation". Ready?
You all have quite properly made your voices heard. Now there is an expectation that tomorrow's meeting will reflect that nationwide anger and frustration. That's the way politics and social reform have worked for some thousands of years. Whether from the soapbox or the valve radio, Personal anger needs to reflect in a public display.
We are reliably informed that Cannel 4 news will be filming the event. There will be quite a few journalists present. Will they witness a revolt? Hundreds of angry consumers demanding the return of their rights?
Here's the reality. 52 people have signed up for tomorrow. Sure, some people will come without letting us know, but still more simply won't show. We've organised dozens of these meetings with the same dynamics for each.
52. Amazing. And half of those are industry or media. Yes, I want a consultation, but it takes more than one party to make that happen. |
well you cant say i didnt tell you , you should have ,or perhaps you still might, theres time yet, forget the 16th century townhall meeting style, and instead draged this into the 21st century wireless interweb live streamed meeting place style.
as requested by the Cable Forum membership
all the tech and tech help you require is right there on the london campus and in the room is it not?
after all, these web interception for profit PIA projects are regarding every single
individual stakeholders that is web connected, the perfect match, it's not rocket science.