View Single Post
Old 14-04-2008, 19:08   #3268
mark777
Inactive
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Services: 0.4 Mbps BB + Phone
Posts: 447
mark777 is a glorious beacon of lightmark777 is a glorious beacon of lightmark777 is a glorious beacon of lightmark777 is a glorious beacon of lightmark777 is a glorious beacon of lightmark777 is a glorious beacon of lightmark777 is a glorious beacon of light
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]

Quote:
Originally Posted by SimonHickling View Post
After asking the Home Office what "the official Home Office stance is on the
provision under RIPA for both parties in the conversation giving consent to be
intercepted?". I have recieved a reply telling me

"The matters you have raised are the responsibility of Department for
Business Enterprise & Regulatory Reform."

And they have forwarded my e-mail. So much for RIPA being the responsibility of the Home Office?

A confused and a bit angry Simon.
I had a written reply from my MP a few days ago saying he had written to John Hutton, the Business Secretary. i.e. the same department, passing on my concerns.

So same message as Home Office from a Labour MP.

I don't know if they are trying to deflect this by dealing with the advertising bit rather than the privacy bit?

This department is responsible for regulatory reform though so I don't know if that has a bearing.

I don't expect to hear anything until after the local elections.

(I did ask him to raise the BT/RIPA issue with the Home Office, so maybe that's what the HO told my MP to do).
mark777 is offline