[Pasanonic]

I shall have to leave it here for the day.

I was expecting a little more than that to be honest Simon. I did not mean to question your integrity but to merely point out that in your current position as sub-contracted employee of Phorm Inc I'd find it less than credible that you could issue any kind of statement of findings that would be harmful to the client.

Once again. It matters not that you are a director of PI. The two positions are clearly separate and opposed and you have to address this issue from the standpoint of Phorm employee.

You have reiterated your claims to neutrality and I shall accept that.
However you've not touched on many of the issues raised today ( even though they number somewhat less than 50 ) and it smacks of the usual
"if we can't put a positive spin on the answer then don't answer" tactic.

You probably don't deserve to be embroiled in this farce but as it stands you formed a company purely to service the Phorm contract ( in my opinion based on what I have read here ) and I don't doubt that it was lucrative both in retainers and any future earnings from what could grow to be the largest global business model on the planet if not halted now.
It's just incredible that you would sully your reputation with these people given what you know in this area. I hope you can come through it without further harm.

I'd still like your opinion as to us getting OIX partner information released so that we might ensure we can create a blocklist.

kindest regards

Craig.