Quote:
Originally Posted by mark777
Agreed, but the arguments at the moment, particularly on Tuesday, should centre on what they have done (BT trials and 121media history) and what they are planning to do (breach all the laws you have outlined etc).
What they could do needs to be laid out then left alone, as the thin end of the wedge.
I'm just saying concentrate on the things that we know are wrong now, rather than the things that may go wrong in the future. There are strong arguments about what we know now.
|
I will be focusing completely on the 2006/2007 trials whilst making sure to mention which laws would still be broken if they deployed the current model in the present day (Fraud Act 2006, RIPA, Copyright, DPA, PECR).
That doesn't mean man in the middle attacks or any other uses of the technology shouldn't be debated in this thread. I don't recall anyone saying they were going to raise the issue of Man in the Middle attacks at the public meeting.
Of course, if as we expect this is just another PR arena, I doubt I will be given the opportunity to ask any questions, because that would be a really stupid thing for them to do.
With regards the comment someone made about a QC, QCs don't scare me, I have dressed down more than one top legal professional in front of a Judge before now (barristers) and utterly embarrassed them in the process (much to the amusement of the presiding Judge).
Alexander Hanff