Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby's-Nutz
Ok guys I couldn’t resist posting on this blog.
Could someone please explain the point of this stupid p.r. stunt next Tuesday or can’t Bent Kent get it into his tiny little rootkit yet that it’s all over now? I do understand he may challenge our law but on what grounds? There are none.
|
Given that the meeting involves 80/20, I suspect it's all part of the privacy impact statement. Having said that, i'm sure they want to try to trip people up, probably over the legalities. They will certainly have something up their sleeves.
One thing that I think is likely to happen is, when challenging over the legal side, the anti-phorm challenger will be asked 'Are you a lawyer?'.
The Phorm side will then have someone stand up and say 'I'm a QC and I say you are wrong because ...'