Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexanderHanff
It is difficult to file for an injunction in its own right, from my understanding of the procedures. The most effective way to file for an injunction would be as an attachment to existing action (criminal trial of the BT trials for example, or litigation from some of the victims of the BT trials) which is much more likely to succeed.
I would hope FIPR will apply for an injunction but I am not sure it is feasible at this time. There is work being done with regards to filing a case from at least one of the trial victims, so if that goes ahead, it is certainly (in my mind) a legal option.
Alexander Hanff
---------- Post added at 21:19 ---------- Previous post was at 21:14 ----------
Of course it is unlikely that we will ever see the actual poll they did as I doubt they obtained informed consent from the participants. This might actually be the one time we see their interpretation of consent match what we all interpret as well, which will simply show them for the hypocrites they are.
Alexander Hanff
|
What about a civil injunction then? (from:
http://www.elc.org.uk/pages/lawukcourts.htm)
- a claim that one side has breached a duty imposed by the common law without the need for there to be a contract, for example, a civil action can be brought if a person defames you or trespasses on your land.
Does common law include RIPA etc?
Regards
WinstonS