Quote:
Originally Posted by rogermevans
cant remember if this bits the same as before
"A question has been raised by the some individuals about whether or not the Phorm products entails an unlawful interception of communications under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA). The Home Office is responsible for compliance with RIPA and Phorm has approached the office directly and had a written response. Some organisations have stressed an alternative view that the scanning of the content of websites by the ISP on route to the user will entail an interception of communication during transmission. This is a matter that the Home Office takes the lead on and the Commissioner will not be taking any further action."
but they are passing the buck to home office it seems
|
That just means we can all write to the Secretary of State for Justice under the "advisement from the Information Commissioner" requesting an investigation of the BT Trials and future deployment of Phorm under RIPA. That will be template #2 then
Alexander Hanff
---------- Post added at 13:21 ---------- Previous post was at 13:07 ----------
Someone get this info posted on iii asap please. I would say it is definitely in the interests of investors to know that Phorm will be required to be Opt-In, which significantly devalues it as an investment.
Alexander Hanff
---------- Post added at 13:24 ---------- Previous post was at 13:21 ----------
Wow I am grinning from ear to ear
Such a good day!