Thread: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
View Single Post
Old 06-04-2008, 18:39   #2519
AlexanderHanff
Permanently Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,028
AlexanderHanff is the helpful oneAlexanderHanff is the helpful oneAlexanderHanff is the helpful oneAlexanderHanff is the helpful oneAlexanderHanff is the helpful oneAlexanderHanff is the helpful oneAlexanderHanff is the helpful oneAlexanderHanff is the helpful oneAlexanderHanff is the helpful oneAlexanderHanff is the helpful oneAlexanderHanff is the helpful oneAlexanderHanff is the helpful oneAlexanderHanff is the helpful oneAlexanderHanff is the helpful oneAlexanderHanff is the helpful oneAlexanderHanff is the helpful oneAlexanderHanff is the helpful oneAlexanderHanff is the helpful one
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
OK the article is really coming along now, so far I have covered:

1. European Convention on Human Rights (1950)
2. Human Rights Act (1998)
3. Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (2000)
4. Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003
5. Computer Misuse Act 1990 (both Scottish and English versions)
6. Fraud Act 2006

I still have to write about:

1. Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1997
2. Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988
3. Data Protection Act 1998
4. The Council of Europe's Convention on Cybercrime

That will be the legal stuff finished I think which will then leave my conclusion. So far, I can only believe that the trials of 2006/2007 after careful analysis of UK Law were incredibly illegal, led to multiple criminal offences under multiple laws and leave BT open to litigation under Tort Law.

You can see the article so far on http://www.paladine.org.uk/phorm_paper.pdf

Alexander Hanff
AlexanderHanff is offline