Quote:
Originally Posted by amateria
"with fraudulent or dishonest intent of procuring, without right, an economic benefit for oneself or for another person."
I think copyright licensing comes in here, because the absence of one means that you are "without right".
|
i was thinking ( cant find the quote at sec will look in a bit if others don't find it first ) that some where it said that during the process applied by phorm they change the header or something to from thier site to imitate the site that was intercepted, personally if they dont have permision to do so that i would sat that was forgery
plus as they wont have it seems web sites permision ( nor mine
lol ) then as they are doing it for to make money then the second one would kick in
i don't fully get the copy right thing all together but if that helps to good for it