Thanks to everyone who contributed ideas for the "simple" website. I do intend to change its name to make it more acceptable to organisations such as the BBC, and will let you know once that's in place.
In the mean time, here are some specific changes:
Quote:
Originally Posted by popper
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mark777
Portly, you have a great idea, but the first line can't go into deep packet inspection. They are not techies and will turn off.
|
popper – I agree about the importance of emphasising deep packet inspection. However, I also agree with mark777 and roadrunner69 that expressed as such it is too technical for ordinary users. So I have reworded the intro substantially.
However, at the end of the attributions I have added a prominent reference to the Wikipedia article, along with Richard Clayton’s recent paper.
I have made all these changes live at
http://www.whyphormisbad.org and would welcome any further comments.