Quote:
Originally Posted by Barkotron
Just a quickie as I go - I'd amend "deliberately deceived" on page 4. It's perfectly possible that it's a case of left hand not knowing what the right is doing rather than a deliberate attempt to lie. From what I remember haven't they already stated that customer services didn't know about it? Personally I'd give them the benefit of the doubt over this one: having worked in tandem with a lot of large corporations, I'm firmly of the cock-up rather than conspiracy school.
Back to the paper...
|
I umm'd and arrr'd over that one myself. I decided to leave it as is simply because if it is a case of one hand not knowing what the other is doing, they have still indirectly deceived their customers because they have deliberately not told customer services. Customer services should have been informed and someone must have made a decision not to inform them.
I will change it though if people think it is the better option.
Alexander Hanff
---------- Post added at 14:55 ---------- Previous post was at 14:53 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by manxminx
Just a couple of small points Alexander, embedded links 11 and 17 (the FIPR ones) don't work, and you appear to have your spell check language set to US English.
As for the content, I'll leave it for more intelligent people than myself to comment!
|
I don't have embedded links in my pdf reader so I am unable to test/fix that. Cut and Paste should work though.
Alexander Hanff