Quote:
Originally Posted by popper
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mark H on the BT forum
Lastly, and most importantly in my opinion, you will notice that one of those sites is SECURE as in it uses a https connection, yet still had the javascript inserted, how can we be sure of BT and phorms assertations that all secure pages will be ignored after seeing that?
|
|
Despite what Peter N said on the BT forum, I’ve had no problem with that secure link. The website is providing both secure and insecure access to what is otherwise identical content. The ‘phormed’ poster would have posted using the insecure access. We just happen to be using HTTPS to look at what was posted. Having both secure and insecure access allows people to choose to visit your site with out interception, while still allowing search engines to index it.
I now fully endorse Phorm. As it’s impossible to report Phorm intercepting sensitive information, I’m off to buy my Reg-S shares…