View Single Post
Old 01-04-2008, 18:46   #2014
mark777
Inactive
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Services: 0.4 Mbps BB + Phone
Posts: 447
mark777 is a glorious beacon of lightmark777 is a glorious beacon of lightmark777 is a glorious beacon of lightmark777 is a glorious beacon of lightmark777 is a glorious beacon of lightmark777 is a glorious beacon of lightmark777 is a glorious beacon of light
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]

Quote:
Originally Posted by OF1975 View Post
My petition was rejected not only the spurious grounds of "duplication" but also because in their words it is:

* Potentially libellous, false, or defamatory statements

To say I am angry is to understate things. I immediately fired off an email back to them pointing out that BT have themselves admitted to the trial last july and that they had no consent. I gave them links to the relevant articles and forcibly reminded them that BT executives are NOT above the law.

I will be resubmitting another petition in a few minutes time then going to watch channel 4 news and then the Manchester United V Roma match.
I've seen petitions regarding specific criminal cases rejected on the grounds that these should be specifically directed to the Home Office. This is in the last couple of days, and I don't know where this new Justice Ministry fits in. It might be worth a look around just to see if there are any contacts.
mark777 is offline