[OF1975]

My petition was rejected not only the spurious grounds of "duplication" but also because in their words it is:

* Potentially libellous, false, or defamatory statements

To say I am angry is to understate things. I immediately fired off an email back to them pointing out that BT have themselves admitted to the trial last july and that they had no consent. I gave them links to the relevant articles and forcibly reminded them that BT executives are NOT above the law.

I will be resubmitting another petition in a few minutes time then going to watch channel 4 news and then the Manchester United V Roma match.

---------- Post added at 18:46 ---------- Previous post was at 18:30 ----------

OK another petition submitted which is smaller and a little gentler... added a few "potentially" and "may have contravened" etc etc What are you betting they reject it again still saying that its libelous etc