Quote:
Originally Posted by mark777
OF1975
I just had a quick peep at the share summary link in your signature. I was greeted with the following advert.
"Short this share with CFD Trading. Low commission: Equity CFDs (trade from £10)."
Perhaps there is something to be said about targeted advertising!  |
LOL Shhhhhhhh whisper that quietly lest the phorm PR team start using that quote against ya LOL
The only adverts I would be remotely interested in right now are adverts telling us how to land a "killer blow" against phorm and others like it.
Its good to see that according to the website in my signature the change in Phorms share price over the last month is down by 48.2%. They are definately wounded at the moment.
EDIT: Alexander, I cant tell you much about injunctions. I failed my law A-level back in 2000 because I had hip replacement surgery shortly before the exam and hadnt really been in a frame of mind to revise properly.
I imagine that you would most likely need to apply to the High Court in London in this instance because of the scope of the injunction. In cases with lesser ramifications I believe some magistrates courts can hear cases that would normally need a high court injunction but I doubt that applies here.
One last note... there is one other possibility... if anyone involved in the BT trials last summer reports it to the police and the police refuse to issue a crime reference number or refuse to investigate then they might be able to apply for a judicial review of that decision although I think typically those kinds of cases are very expensive.
Vis-a-vis building a site list you can count me in. I will get looking.