View Single Post
Old 24-03-2008, 15:28   #10
Derek
Inactive
 
Derek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Glasgow
Services: SkyHD and Broadband
Posts: 9,158
Derek has a pair of shiny starsDerek has a pair of shiny starsDerek has a pair of shiny stars
Derek has a pair of shiny starsDerek has a pair of shiny starsDerek has a pair of shiny starsDerek has a pair of shiny starsDerek has a pair of shiny starsDerek has a pair of shiny starsDerek has a pair of shiny starsDerek has a pair of shiny starsDerek has a pair of shiny starsDerek has a pair of shiny starsDerek has a pair of shiny starsDerek has a pair of shiny starsDerek has a pair of shiny starsDerek has a pair of shiny starsDerek has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Fingerprints At Airports

Quote:
Originally Posted by foreverwar
He said photographs were "less intrusive" and BAA's case for fingerprinting at Heathrow had not been made
Less intrusive but also less exact. Personally I'd be OK with it *IF* there were guarantees the data was wiped after you flew out. (actually I'd be OK with it full stop as my fingerprints and DNA are already logged but thats another argument)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xaccers View Post
As for fingerprints, the case of Shirley McKie demonstrates how wrong they can be.
http://www.shirleymckie.com/
Except she was at the crime scene... (errr allegedly )

Besides that a full fingerprint is virtually foolproof, it's only when you get into fragments and smudges of a fingerprint issues arise.
Derek is offline   Reply With Quote