Quote:
Originally Posted by foreverwar
But it isn't just about the photo - as the family said (in the OP link)
"Ms Whitear's parents said they would not have given their consent for the image to be used by any political party and were especially concerned about the claims made in the leaflet.
Her stepfather, Mick Holcroft, told the BBC they were exploring the legal steps they can take through the courts.
Her mother Pauline Holcroft said: "Our biggest concern is that because they have printed Rachel's name on the front of the leaflet it looks to all intents and purposes as if we are backing it, as if we had given our consent. "That is far from the truth." "
|
Well it still makes no difference as the parents don't have to give consent. If they don't like then i am afraid it is tough, they shouldn't have released the image. Using the name is legal too isn't it?
On this occasion i have to side with the BNP in the photo usage when they say they did nothing 'legally' wrong.
I guess the parents are a little upset by them calling their 'lovely' daughter a parasite but unfortunately most heroin addicts just so.