Quote:
Originally Posted by manxminx
That's a passive way of doing it, and I will be doing that. But maybe a better way would be to send them a registered letter, give notice under RIPA and then request that they furnish me with the details of how they intend to comply with my notice. That way I've got it in writing from them.
|
true, passive for most people will be the main easy option,you can be sure there are a few people getting ready to track the trackers and then take them to the cleaners
however, if you can get the ISPs to infact write you in response, then that too could be a very good stick to use later.
i suspect their first thought would be to put you into a blacklist file of some sort, but that too perhaps opens many legal doors you can then use against them.
how do they deal with an opted-in user wanting to visit an on notice website.
and thats ignoring the fact they cant really know if the sites got a no profiling notice until they have potentially unlawfully parsed the site and processed it in some way, its all starting to sound real expensive if not impossible.
---------- Post added at 22:13 ---------- Previous post was at 21:56 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirius
I think the poo will hit the fan now.
This is the trial and test that BT's own tech support classed as an adware infection, They later denied they ever did it. It was a test of what was to become the Phorm Spyware system
---------- Post added at 21:46 ---------- Previous post was at 21:29 ----------
Just found this on Skyuser Forum
http://www.skyuser.co.uk/forum/polls...tml#post135285 |
i liked this bit best.
"we’ll only implement a solution when
we can use customer data in a responsible way which safeguards privacy"
they or indeed anyone never mentions anything about
paying the users
a licence fee for legal use of
their data.