Cable Forum - View Single Post

**Mick** · 15-03-2008, 18:14

Yeah but as already said TBR - not everyone wants to pay into the coffers of a Murdoch owned franchise. Not when someone has the *apparent* ability to control the press.

The cost differences doesn't make one product better than another. I have all four services from VM and paying Ã‚Â£40 for the lot and I also have a V+ box too, like to see Sky do all that, oh wait a minute they cannot, they don't offer a mobile service.

15-03-2008, 18:14	#129
Mick Cable Forum Team Join Date: Jun 2003 Posts: 15,139	Re: Wait, Wait, Wait... Sky's beating VM?! Yeah but as already said TBR - not everyone wants to pay into the coffers of a Murdoch owned franchise. Not when someone has the apparent ability to control the press. The cost differences doesn't make one product better than another. I have all four services from VM and paying Ã‚Â£40 for the lot and I also have a V+ box too, like to see Sky do all that, oh wait a minute they cannot, they don't offer a mobile service.