http://seekbroadband.com/focus/2008/...sed-vs-actual/
According to them, Sky deliver speeds closer to, or on the speeds they advertise, with Virgin media being second.
This is a joke, right? We all know that the technicalities of both networks mean that Sky simply CANT deliver the speeds the promise... and Virgin should be closer to fulfilling that obligation!
Is this just a case of p*ss poor surveys, people not knowing what they are on about, or consumers lying about their speeds?