View Single Post
Old 11-03-2008, 18:24   #10
Xaccers
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milling around Milton Keynes
Age: 48
Posts: 12,969
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Bring Back The Royal Tournament

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_love_monkey View Post
At the risk of being unpopular, what's the point of bringing it back? - if it was losing £400k in 1999, it because people weren't going to see it - to bring it back, and waste what would probably be more money these days just seems pointless.
I'm all for paying homage to the guys and gals who go out and do the things I wouldn't want to do, but surely there's a better way to do this than to bring back a show that the majority of people didn't want to see in the first place?
Exactly, like using the money which would have been spent on it, on making service accomodation decent for starters.
Xaccers is offline   Reply With Quote