View Single Post
Old 10-03-2008, 20:43   #17
TheNorm
Inactive
 
TheNorm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cambridge
Services: Sky TV, VM TV, 20meg bb, tel, and a lobster (but the lobster died).
Posts: 4,349
TheNorm has a nice shiny star
TheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny star
Re: Defending the indefensible?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Osem View Post
... it's hard to justify someone getting off a serious charge just because of one.
It happens. Full stop. Therefore, the form filler should be extremely careful.

If I lost a friend to a drunk driver who was later released because someone forgot to fill in a field on a form, I would be angry at two people.

---------- Post added at 20:43 ---------- Previous post was at 20:42 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Derek S View Post


Never made a spelling or typing mistake in your life then.
All the time. But my mistakes don't let criminals off the hook.


Even worse; this sort of thing should never happen:

Quote:
...Last week charges were dropped against company executive Jon Bradshaw who was found by his crashed car with more than four times the legal blood-alcohol level in his system. Under cross-examination the arresting officer admitted he had tested a sample of Mr Bradshaw's blood without his consent, while he was unconscious.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/m...er/4547216.stm
TheNorm is offline   Reply With Quote