Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ B
I think you're getting him mixed up with Jimmy Saville.
In any case "Mr Loophole" is right, he goes after procedure faults rather than getting off a charge someone is clearly guilty of.
|
It was put to him today that he defends those who have been guilty of offences and all too often secures their acquittal due to technicalities, often irregularities in the paperwork etc. All he would say was that his job was to ensure the correct procedures were followed at no point did he say he ever refused to defend someone he knew to be guilty.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/5279672.stm
Quote "He also admits that he defends people on drink-driving charges even when they are undeniably over the legal limit of alcohol."