[shawty]

Originally Posted by THESHAOLIN1

LOL @ meaning to pull the firemen out the building i watched the program on bbc you scapegoater, they physically were talking about world trade centre 7 at the time. Its a prooven fact you think people would use that as evidence if it was referring to the firemen you really are insane.

Yes, and Im physically talking about WTC7 now. Again, I will mention that if the building was rigged with explosives (which it isnt as it would take weeks to plan and carry out, not to mention how they have not been caught rigging the building up, maybe you should watch a controlled demolition, not one happening, but one been rigged up) dont you think the fires that were going for hours would of set of the explosives?

People underestimate how well this is thought out.

Yes we do, because we didnt think people in caves had this much iteligance (if you can call it that) to pull of a stunt like this.

And as for how many would be involved in the conspiracy as far as that goes most people wont even be aware of what there doing besides intelligence agencies whose job it is to do that and has been for years anyway as EX CIA and MI5 and MI6 have clearly shown us in there revelations.

Ive just told you, we have the BBC (well they must be in on it, they reported the building collapsing before it did), Larry Silverstone and people connected to him, parts of the government, people firing the misiles, people who said they had seen a plane hit it, people on the plane and their familys. And if not to top it all of, you are saying that Bush, the BBC and Larry Silverstone have blown the cover open by all three of them admiting something they shouldnt, please have some common sense.

+ the amount of papers n past evidence showing the CIA n other intelligence agencies are involved in mass drug trafficking.

Where is the evidence, plus what as this got to do with 9/11.

a plane hit the pentagon obviously, but a missile hit it aswell as is apparent or it was blew up via an explosive device, and notice the area that was blown up was the a navy sector this was because theres an internal intelligence agency war between intelligence agencies with certain members joining together wanting to expose the truth.

So you admit a plane hit the pentagon? Why the hell do they also need a missile, come on, common sense again please, just think about it for a second. Why risk using a missile when a plane does the same damage. Oh, are all the firemen in on it to? Larry Silverstone said they should "pull it" to them to.

and before 9/11 there was a drill in which the building was searched for bombs by a bomb squad this is well known and mentioned alot publically this, they could easily of planted explosives in the building that is not a factor especially with this revelation of people removed from the building in advance.

Before I was in a car accident (I wasnt, but you get the drift) I said to my friend that Ive never been in a car crash before, ohhh blame the government its a conspiracy against me. Drills happen almost weekly if not daily in government and army type places, come on, common sense again please. Oh by the way, we have not got the bomb squad involved in this conspiracy, the list is growing pretty quick, how many people do you want to be involved in this?

lol and saying it collapsed before it even had shows they were told to report it before it had even happened meaning the reuters knew about it in advance which is a big indication to the fact it was an inside job and planned and blueprinted. A perfectly carried out event which has led to the war on iraq and the ever going war on terrorism which is a farce to bring in the new world order and as years have gone by ive known this and seen it come true so i certainly know whose living in fantasies when people tell me "your delusional".

Common sense, again please use it. Do you think if the government was resposnible for such a thing, they would be stupid enough to bloody tell the whole world about how it was them? Going by logic, it was most likely mis information spreading across from ground zero when Larry Silverstone said "pull it" because the building had been on fire for hours and was showing signes of collapsing. Anyway, regardless, so reuters are now in on the conspiracy as well? Bloody hell, it was only 5 minutes ago you said that it wouldnt take many people.

and by the way most the people dont even know what there doing that reporter would of just reported it she has no idea she reported it before the incident took place. If she got showed she might ask questions but you couldnt put the link together so i doubt she would.

Which brings us to the point very nicely that logic and common sense states that it was a mistake by the person reporting, it usually happens in live events, nothing new about it.

It works through the employment control system you know on a need to know basis on what your doing, if your jobs that high you find out about the secrets behind 9/11 your gonna be in the position to keep it under wraps. Such as The CIA, politicians n alike people who are freemasons n have all pledged they will protect there brother freemasons no matter what and carried out initiations which involve placing your hand on a skull n pledging your soul to lucifer.

You keep thinking that, if the evidence was so strong, the US Government and everyone else involved would be facing the death penalty. No such evidence excists, it has all been debunked.

and world trade centre 7 if you seriously think it was brought down by a fire. You are living in disney land florida im deadly serious i can tell thats a controlled demolition a mile off, the fact you've got larry admitting it prooves my point exactly, you've just attempted to take his words out of context to fit your reality.

He never admitted nothing. He said "pull it" meaning pull the fireman operation due to it being to unsafe and the threat of collapse. I dont know how much common sense you have (not much by the looks of it), but WTC7 had two of the biggest building known to man collapse right next to it, dont you think that would of weakend the foundations of the building? Plus add on the fact the building was on fire for hours. As Ive said and how some logic please, the fires would of set of the explosives well before it had collapsed anyway, also take into the fact how long and how many people it would take to rig such a building that has not been emptied from its contents or people. Please go and watch documentries on how controlled demolitions take place before the collapse.

In conclusion, it seems to me you have watched and read a few things on 9/11 and based no common sense or logic on the situation and just added 2+2 and came out with 896754. You have done no research what so ever.